Who should lead communications planning?

By Antony Young, appeared in MediaPost on March 16, 2011.

Media used to be the last five minutes in the meeting.

In an era where creative ruled the roost, selling the big advertising idea was the stuff of legends. “Just Do It,” “Priceless,” “Where’s the Beef” … great slogans and great ads in a time where advertising and brands were more easily able to penetrate the consciousness of the consumer on mass. Today, we live in a more personalized and connected communications landscape that has blurred the lines between analog and digital; content and context; and audience and editor.

There are just so much more media and tactics that marketers have available at their disposal. As a result, agencies and clients have elevated the media agenda. And this is why communications planning is now a hot topic of discussion and was the subject of a panel I chaired at last weeks 4A’s Transformation 2011 conference.

Communications planning has become a fertile battleground for the media agencies. It is seen as a critical area to increase their value proposition to clients. Media buying and execution, while important, have become more commoditized, or at the very least, less differentiating.

Comms planning encapsulates the shift in role from delivering the creative message to exploiting media to creating more relevant, memorable and interactive occasions with the brand. It has become a chief ingredient to the integrated marketing communications recipe.

Speaking on the panel, Jacki Kelley, UM’s Worldwide CEO summed up this shift by describing communications planning as a more consumer-centric approach to planning media, describing it as “a holistic approach to understanding key behaviors that a consumer is taking in order to better connect with them and the brand.”

Communications planning isn’t just the domain of the media agencies.

Creative powerhouse, Goodby Silverstein & Partners has embraced the function for many years. Joshua Spanier, the agency’s director of communications strategy, believes that bringing together creative and communications planning strategy offers powerful synergy. He argues that the separation of creative and media was a set back for agencies.

A recent development we’ve seen is the interest in communications planning by the digital agencies, in part, due to them branching out beyond their digital realm. As the general agencies have digitized, many digital agencies are now massaging their positioning as more rounded communication agencies.

What they are able to bring is a heavier leaning on analytics, adding more rigor to the planning process. “The integration of previously disparate data-sets and tools are moving into one common language and currency that can break boundaries,” commented Scott Hagedorn, CEO of Annalect, who was previously CEO of PHD.

Founding partner of Naked Communications, Paul Woolmington argued that any agency that was tied to execution [presumably creative, media or digital agencies] couldn’t truly be media neutral … a critical criteria in developing a communications plan. He added that in his view “everything communicates” and therefore, marketers need to consider all their options rather than lean towards a particular channel.

While the panel couldn’t entirely agree on which agency should lead, they were all in agreement that clients ultimately were responsible for owning the communications strategy.

The panel felt that media owners can play an important role in communications planning. One considerable area is in helping them to better understand the latest consumer trends and how to engage their audiences. For example, what doesn’t MTV know about GenY? The editors at The Wall Street Journal know better than anyone else what’s keeping CEOs up at night.

UM’s Kelley candidly confessed: “One reason I came to the agency side of the business … is that I found – while being a seller – there are very rarely people at the agencies unlocking the insights that I could have provided.”

Spanier added that “content has gone beyond just advertising.” Access to co-branded content by media partners is proving a powerful strategy for some advertisers.

Communications planning is increasingly becoming a requisite discipline in the agency world. There remain contrary views on how it might be executed, and who should lead. But what appears clear is the need to provide a solution for clients to help deploy their budgets and navigate across the plethora of media channels and platforms.

Groping For Answers

-By Antony Young
Communications planning is a bit like early teen sex. A lot of curiosity, plenty of talk and possibly some experimentation, but rarely is it being practiced as regularly as it is being bragged about.

At best, communications planning is being offered up as an added value proposition by the major media agencies rather than being central to the agency’s offering. Yet there are strong signals that a shift is taking place that could have significant implications as to how agencies organize and structure their approach to their clients’ businesses.

Simply put, communications planning is a more strategic way of determining key media choices and connection strategies. It is about moving away from the science of delivering messages to audiences and toward the art of understanding how consumers receive and respond to communication. The starting point is the consumer, not the media channel or discipline. When practiced at its best, communications planning not only influences where a marketer’s creative will run, but also informs the creative, strategic and activation processes as well.

Fifteen years ago, there were fewer media channels, and marketers seemed prepared to accept that half of their advertising wasn’t working, because the other half was supporting a growing business base. Now, with the pressure on corporate earnings, companies are being forced to improve marketing’s productivity.

Communications planning is also increasingly becoming more important due to the impact of the Internet, both in terms of viable channels by which to talk to consumers and its ability to affect purchasing behavior and facilitate brand interaction. According to a survey by Netpop|U.S., four of the top six sources used for influencing purchase decisions are found online, with “browsing in retail stores” only slightly edging out search engines as the most important influencer.

Marketers are quickly feeling it’s uncomfortable to manage their mass advertising media channels separately from other specialist communication channel disciplines, in particular digital, but also in-store, sponsorship, marketing PR and trade efforts. Determining how those channels are integrated into the marketing communication effort is a core role of communications planning.

While U.S. marketers may not be asking for communications planning services by name yet, they’re increasingly asking their agencies for solutions to marketing problems that communications planning is uniquely suited to address. We are seeing a growing number of marketers putting a greater emphasis on strategy over execution. Strategy is about coming up with ways to not just make a brand relevant, but also to differentiate from its competition.

Communications planning has many facets, but it is first and foremost about setting a strategy that defines how you communicate your brand in ways that differ significantly from your competitors. For this reason alone, it could become the most important tool a CMO needs—and that an agency can offer. If you have the same strategy as a rival brand that’s spending more than you, you’ll find yourself lost in the clutter of sameness, a condition few marketers can afford in these challenging economic times.

Communications planning in the U.S. has often been packaged as media planning plus. It is rarely at the center of an agency’s proposition as most media agencies’ profits are derived from media buying. That is clearly an outdated model. There is also a need to change the mentality of agencies. Too often agencies (no matter which type) want to own the idea or lead the strategy. Profit centers and egos have inhibited integration and need to give way to collective ownership and partnership.

We are at an important crossroads. The agencies that will succeed are those that embrace a more integrated approach to client problem solving, as well as the added responsibility—and potential rewards—that it entails.

(Adapted from an article that appeared in Mediaweek)

‘Dexter’ vs. ‘True Blood’: The Battle of Two Killer Media Plan

Two shows whose marketing has stood out in recent years, however, don’t even have commercial time for marketers and their agencies to buy: Showtime’s “Dexter” and HBO’s “True Blood.”

http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=144011

Visa vs. MasterCard: Who’s on the Money?

The credit-card companies were presented with some challenges in 2009. First and foremost, the risk that their advertising is seen as encouraging reckless spending or increasing consumer debt; and secondly, being closely associated with the financial institutions seen as responsible for much the economy’s woes. So how did they handle their media campaigns while driving their business?

http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=140788

Panasonic vs. LG: Who Delivered the Sharper Image in Media?

Unit sales of digital TV sets in 2009 will reach nearly 35 million, up about 8% from 2008. The category is flooded by a multitude of Japanese, Korean, European and Chinese brands. While consumers are all too ready to compare side-by-side prices, technology and design, we like to think that marketing and promotion still helps influence brand choice. Panasonic and LG, two brands battling to pull out in front of the pack and compete with established market leaders Sony and Samsung, employed different media strategies. Let’s see how they did.

http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=137199

Macy’s vs. Wal-Mart: The Battle for Black Friday

Macy’s and Wal-Mart, two heavyweights of the retail world, led the way with aggressive media campaigns to promote the must-win battle for Black Friday. Competition for shopper dollars was going to be intense. While these retailers clearly chase different customer segments, we couldn’t resist the opportunity for a head-to-head comparison of their respective media strategies.

http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=132951

Who Had the Better Media Strategy: CW’s ’90210′ or NBC’s ‘Knight Rider’?

This month’s new fall TV schedule saw a number of returning favorites from the previous season, but two notable franchises also found their way back onto our screens. The CW’s makeover of “Beverly Hills 90210″ and NBC’s revival of “Knight Rider” were two shows that almost everyone remembered. Would viewers invite them back? And how would a new generation of 18- to 34-year-olds respond?

http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=131291

Iron Man vs. The Dark Knight – Which Superhero Movie Packed the Biggest Media Punch?

Summer blockbusters “Iron Man” and “The Dark Knight” both showed superhero-like powers when it came to pulling in box-office receipts. “The Dark Knight” delivered a thumping $158.4 million last weekend — an industry record. “Iron Man’s” $98.6 million initial weekend take surpassed all expectations. Talented directors, great lead talent and sensational reviews from critics were naturally a major part of both films’ successes. But the marketing and media behind these two Hollywood franchises was a critical ingredient to maximizing both films’ potential.

http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=129826

Hillary vs. Barack: Who Had the Smartest Media Strategy?

The race for the Democrat presidential nomination has been an intensely competitive contest, the equivalent of marketing’s Coke vs. Pepsi or Ford vs. GM. In the battle that was Brand Obama vs. Brand Clinton, targeted demographics, TV ads, digital strategies, brand integrations and viral campaigns have all played a role in promoting the two candidates’ campaigns.

http://adage.com/campaigntrail/post?article_id=127508

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,080 other followers